The
title of "Pharaoh" actually comes to us from the Greek language and
its use in the Old Testament. It originates in the Egyptian Per-aa,
meaning "Great House", a designation of the palace, which first came
to be used as a label for the king around 1450 BC, though it only
became common usage some centuries later. For most of the time, the
usual word for the king of ancient Egypt was nesu, but a whole range
of titles were applicable to any full statement of a king's names
and titulary.
According to Egyptian
legend, the first kings of Egypt were later some of Egypt's most
famous gods. We really do not know whether some of these individuals
actually existed in human form or what regions of Egypt they may
have ruled over. Only at the end of the Predynastic period, prior to
the unification of Egypt, can we recognize specific kings who most
likely ruled over either northern or southern Egypt. According to
many sources, the first real king of Egypt, therefore ruling over
the unified land, was Menes, who would have ruled Egypt around 3100
BC, but we have little if any archaeological basis for this name.
Most scholars today believe that he may have been a king named
Narmer, or more likely still, Aha, two figures that are better
attested in the archaeological record. However,
Menes
might have also been a legendary composition of several rulers.
After these first rulers of a unified Egypt, the Egyptian monarchy
lasted in a recognizable form for over three thousand years,
basically ending with Cleopatra, though even Roman emperors
attempted to style themselves as Egyptian pharaohs. We know of 170
or more specific pharaohs during this period of time. Although many
changes occurred during that time, almost all of the fundamentals
remained the same.
Kings were not only males,
and unlike in modern monarchies, the ruler of ancient Egypt, whether
male or female, was always called a king. In fact, Egypt had some
very noteworthy female rulers such as Hatshepsut and others.
In ancient (Pharaonic)
Egypt, the pinnacle of Egyptian society, and indeed of religion, was
the king. Below him were the layers of the educated bureaucracy
which consisted of nobles, priests and civil servants, and under
them were the great mass of common people, usually living very poor,
agricultural based lives. Except during the earliest of themes, when
the highest official was apparently a Chancellor, for
most
of Egyptian history, the man or men just under the king were
Viziers, (tjaty), a position that was roughly similar to a modern
Prime Minister.
In many if not most
accounts, the king is viewed as an incarnation of Horus, a falcon
god, and the posthumous son of Osiris, who himself was a divine king
slain by his brother, Seth. Horus fought his uncle for the return of
the throne, and part of the accession process of the king was the
proper burial of his predecessor, as Horus carrying out the last
rites of Osiris. In fact, there are a number of cases where such an
act may have been the legal basis for a non-royal figure's ascent of
the throne. However, more usual was the succession of the eldest
son, whose status as heir was frequently, if not always, proclaimed
during his father's lifetime. Furthermore, there were a number of
instances where this was taken a step further by the heir's
coronation as a co-regent prior to the father's death. This has
actually led to much confusion among scholars,
because
in some cases, the young heir began to count his regnal years only
after the death of his father, while in other instances, he started
to do so from the moment of his coronation. The ancient Egyptians
did not use era dating as we do today (BC or AD), but rather relied
on regnal dating of the king's rule, and therefore potential
difficulties for modern, if not ancient, historians can easily be
imagined.
The king himself (or
herself) was the figure upon whom the whole administrative structure
of the state rested. These god-kings usually commanded tremendous
resources. The Pharaoh was the head of the civil administration, the
supreme warlord and the chief priest of every god in the kingdom.
All offerings were made in his name and the entire priesthood acted
in his stead. In fact, he was himself a divine being, considered the
physical offspring of a god. The myth of the ruler's divine birth
centered on the god assuming the form of (or becoming incarnate in)
the king's father, who then impregnated his wife, who accordingly
bore the divine ruler.
Of course, the king was
also subject to some rather grave responsibilities. Through his
dealings with the gods, he was tasked with keeping the order, or
ma'at of the land, and therefore keeping out chaos, often in the
form of the enemies of Egypt from foreign lands. But he was
also
responsible for making sufficient offerings and otherwise satisfying
the gods so that they would bless Egypt with a bountiful Nile flood,
and therefore a good enough harvest to feed his people. When he
failed at these tasks, he could bear not only blame, but a weakening
of the state and thus his power. In drastic cases, such as at the
end of the Old Kingdom, this could actually lead to a complete
collapse of the Egyptian state.
Even today, many questions
remain about the kings of ancient Egypt. We have a fairly good idea
of their order through time, though often scholars disagree about
specific dates related to our current form of the calendar. Our
evidence of their order comes mostly from various "kings' lists,
that almost exclusively were made during the New Kingdom. Another
source is the Egyptian history written by Manetho, an Egyptian
priest, but over the years, there have been modifications to both
the kings' lists and Manetho's history made through archaeological
discovery. Nevertheless, there are periods of Egyptian history,
particularly those known as intermediate periods, where very little
information exits on who ruled (usually only a part of)
Egypt.
Basically, Manetho divided
up ancient Egyptian history into thirty dynasties, though this
division is a bit difficult, and modern scholarship has proven it to
be not completely (and sometimes not at all) accurate. Most of the
time, a dynasty consisted of a related family of rulers, though
sometimes dynasties seem to have been broken up due to the
establishment of a new capital. In a number of instances, modern
Egyptologists believe that he may have been incorrect about the end
of a family line.
Even today, the power that
an ancient Egyptian pharaoh commanded in ancient Egypt and the
resources under his control can seem staggering. One need only think
in terms of the Great Pyramids, the wealth of gold and the grand
temples to gain some understanding of their power. They commanded
resources that many modern day states would be hard pressed to
emulate, and they did so at a time when much of the remainder of the
ancient world were struggling for a foothold in history.